Uganda’s Election Week Puts Markets on Alert: Financial Industry Eyes Policy and Stability
- Jan 13
- 6 min read
As Uganda heads into a pivotal national election this week, the country’s financial industry is on high alert. Bankers, investors, and analysts are closely watching for any signals of change in economic policy, fiscal discipline, debt management, monetary continuity, and regulatory stability emerging from the vote. The presidential and parliamentary polls – slated around January 15, 2026 – pit 81-year-old incumbent President Yoweri Museveni against several challengers, including popular opposition figure Bobi. Beyond the political contest, market participants are focused on whether the next government will preserve Uganda’s recent macroeconomic stability or chart a new course that could unsettle markets.
Economic Policy and Fiscal Discipline in Focus at Uganda Election
Despite robust growth projections tied to an upcoming oil boom, experts warn that election-linked spending is straining Uganda’s public. In the run-up to the vote, the government rolled out supplementary budgets and campaign expenditures that widened the fiscal deficit beyond. Analysts note that debt has climbed above 50% of GDP – up sharply from a decade ago – as Uganda borrowed heavily for infrastructure and security. “Rising campaign-linked spending, widening financing gaps, and a growing debt burden risk undermining fiscal discipline,” one Uganda economic advocacy group director.
The Bank of Uganda’s latest surveys indicate commercial banks are bracing for tougher times, anticipating an uptick in loan defaults amid political. Businesses and households alike face pressure, with reduced donor inflows (some aid was cut after recent controversial laws) and higher borrowing costs squeezing.
Banks have largely maintained lending standards but with a bias toward tightening credit in late 2025 as the election. The incumbent Museveni’s campaign has emphasized continuity and even grand ambitions – he pledged to transform Uganda into a $500 billion economy in 15 years if. However, economists are skeptical: they argue that structural weaknesses and governance challenges must be addressed for Uganda to truly accelerate. Opposition candidates like Bobi Wine have rallied voters on promises to “clean up corruption” and improve, which could influence budget priorities and investor perceptions of transparency. Financial analysts note that whichever leadership emerges will face immediate post-election fiscal tests – from reining in deficits to reassuring international lenders. Uganda is already negotiating a new IMF program after a previous arrangement fell through, aiming to shore up confidence and enforce fiscal discipline once the political dust.
Monetary and Regulatory Continuity Expected
One relative anchor of stability has been monetary policy. Inflation is currently tame at around the 5%, thanks in part to the central bank’s tight policy stance. The Bank of Uganda has signaled it will keep the Central Bank Rate steady barring any major. “We urge the BoU to maintain a tight monetary policy to keep inflation within the five percent target,” says Julius Mukunda of the Civil Society Budget Advocacy. This continuity has reassured markets that no matter the election’s outcome, abrupt shifts in interest rate policy are unlikely. For businesses and lenders, regulatory rules have also remained consistent through the campaign period, and no major changes to banking or investment regulations are expected in the immediate aftermath.
Crucially, credit rating agencies and development partners appear cautiously confident that Uganda will avoid instability in economic governance. Fitch Ratings, which affirmed Uganda’s sovereign rating at a modest ‘B’ with stable outlook mid-2025, noted that while political tensions around the election could pose risks to public finances, it “does not expect significant impairment to foreign funding or investment” as a result. In other words, the baseline scenario for investors is one of continuity – a belief that Uganda’s technocratic institutions (like the Finance Ministry and central bank) will keep policies on a steady path and honor debt obligations regardless of who wins at the polls.
Markets Gauge Shilling and Yields amid Jitters
In financial markets, attention is riveted on the Ugandan shilling and government debt yields as election day nears. So far, the shilling has been relatively stable, but currency traders report a “weakening bias” in the coming weeks due to jitters over potential post-election unrest. “There’s a bit of uncertainty and worry around the election in terms of whether some unrest will follow… that will hit confidence,” an independent FX trader in Kampala explained. Memories of previous elections – which sometimes saw street protests and internet blackouts – have some investors hedging against a short-term dip in the shilling’s value. The central bank’s healthy foreign reserves (about $4.3 billion mid-2025) provide a buffer to smooth excessive volatility, and authorities have not hesitated to supply dollars if needed to prevent sharp slides.
Meanwhile, Ugandan government bond markets have remained calm. Yields on Treasury bills are in the low double-digits and longer-term bond rates hover around 17–18%, reflecting tight liquidity and the government’s hefty borrowing needs. Importantly, these elevated yields are seen as driven by fundamental factors – like domestic financing pressures – rather than election fears. “Elections alone do not automatically translate into higher or lower yields. What matters more are fundamentals such as inflation, liquidity conditions, and the government’s financing needs – and those are already well signaled,” notes James Walugembe, a Kampala-based financial analysta. Indeed, many investors have priced in election risk well in advance, and no large swings in bond demand have been observed solely due to politics. Market experts are advising portfolio managers to stay the course and avoid knee-jerk reactions. Diversification across different maturities and asset classes is key, as is maintaining a long-term view rather than pulling back from Uganda. “Unless a major macroeconomic shock occurs, yields are expected to remain broadly stable throughout the election period,” one investment report concluded, urging investors to focus on fundamentals and not headlines.
Lessons from Past Elections
Uganda’s financial community is drawing on historical precedent to navigate this election. Past election cycles – 2011, 2016, and 2021 – each saw the economy hit some turbulence. In 2011, a surge of election spending coinciding with global commodity shocks sent inflation soaring from 5% to over 30%, triggering public unrest (the “Walk to Work” protests) and forcing the central bank into steep rate hikes. The 2016 election brought a noted slowdown in growth; a World Bank review found GDP expansion in the fiscal year after that vote undershot expectations as investors held off on new projects. The 2021 election, coming amid the COVID-19 pandemic, further compounded economic strains and uncertainty. “Elections disrupt foreign direct investment inflows and cause investors to hold off on decisions, leading to a wait-and-see approach,” observes Stephen Kaboyo, a veteran market analyst in Kampala. He notes that in election periods, some expatriate capital even temporarily shifts to regional havens like Nairobi as a precaution. This time around, experts warn that Uganda enters the 2026 polls in a relatively weaker fiscal position than previous cycles – with higher debt and tighter budgets – and thus could emerge economically vulnerable if instability occurs. These lessons are not lost on local banks and asset managers, who have been stress-testing their portfolios for election shocks and ensuring contingency plans are in place.
Veri: Monitoring and Managing Election Risk
Uganda’s banks, insurers, pension funds, and asset managers are increasingly turning to advanced risk analytics platforms like Verī to stay ahead of election-related volatility. The Verī Platform allows financial institutions to monitor real-time indicators and simulate “what-if” scenarios linked to political events. For example, a portfolio manager can use Verī to track exposure to Ugandan sovereign debt and see how a swing in bond yields – perhaps from a post-election credit rating change or surge in government borrowing – would affect portfolio value. Banks can aggregate their loan books and map out which sectors might be most vulnerable if policy shifts or unrest disrupt business activity, enabling preemptive tightening of credit or provisioning. Veri’s currency risk tools help treasurers model shilling fluctuation scenarios, so they can adjust FX hedge positions if election news points to heightened volatility. Additionally, the platform’s alerts on political developments and macroeconomic data give institutions an early warning system to manage event-driven risk. By leveraging Verī’s comprehensive dashboard, Uganda’s financial players can maintain a birds-eye view of their risk exposure – from government bonds to the exchange rate – and execute timely strategies (such as rebalancing assets or securing liquidity buffers) to mitigate potential losses. In short, Verī empowers portfolio managers to transform election uncertainty into a manageable risk, ensuring that even as the nation’s politics shift, financial stability for institutions and their clients can be safeguarded.
Comments